Martin, a reader of this blog, has posted a series of tasting notes of side-by-side comparisons of using yixing pot vs a gaiwan vs a jianshui pot (most likely from YSLLC, I’d iamgine). It’s well worth reading, so please take a look.
Entries categorized as ‘Information’
Yixing vs gaiwan vs Jianshui
March 9, 2011 · Leave a Comment
Categories: Information · Objects
Tagged: teaware, yixing
Using yixing pots
March 5, 2011 · 12 Comments
I used to be a yixing skeptic. I remember buying my first pot, mostly for fun, back when I was still in college. I had no idea what I was doing then, and like many of us, paid some tuition along the way. My first pot came from Tenren, of all places, and was far too large for anything decent. Eventually, I forgot about some wet leaves in it one time (green tieguanyin) and the pot is now no more.
I remember that for the longest time I was a gaiwan user — I didn’t use pots because I thought they messed up the taste of the teas. I want the pure, unadulterated taste of the tea itself, not whatever the pot is doing to it, so gaiwan it was. There was also a practical aspect of it, since I was traveling a lot and carrying anything more than a gaiwan is absolutely insane. So, for the longest time, there were very few pots in the picture.
Over time, however, I have come to appreciate them and have used them more and more. Teas do taste different whether brewed with pots or gaiwans, and different pots do indeed do different things to the same tea. I remember when I visited N in Paris, he remarked how his teas taste different — all because I was using a gaiwan instead of his usual pot for the tea. I now rationalize my use of pots for testing new teas as this: if I normally use this pot for drinking this kind of tea, then I should use this pot to test it. If it tastes terrible with my pot, then I am highly unlikely to enjoy the tea in the long run.
Recently though I have added gaiwan back into the mix of teaware I use with some regularity. For example, I recently tried to drink a tea that I have a few cakes of. It’s a Yiwu from about five or six years ago. In the gaiwan, the tea was sour — enough so that it’s bothersome. In my usual pot for it, the tea is not sour, and displays the characteristic “Yiwu” taste much more clearly. Otherwise, they are similar in profile, but somehow, the tea is improved in the pot.
I’m still not quite sure how this is even possible. I don’t really buy the theory that pots season significantly enough so that it affects the tea in question. They do seem to soften the harsh flavours in a tea, for better or worse, and make the tea more enjoyable. There are tangible benefits to using pots.
Then there are the more question benefits – for example, do older pots do better? How much does clay quality actually matter? Does a pot with bad clay do more or less the same thing as a pot with good clay? How about clays from different places — tokoname, for example, rather than yixing, or shantou pots? Thickness of the pot? Pot collectors are, by and large, not really serious tea drinkers. Like any type of collecting activity, they value the rare, the unusual, the famous, rather than the practical. The best pots for brewing tea is often not the best pots for collecting (just witness the huge 400cc pots that these collectors love to buy). I don’t know anyone who has actually tried to do this sort of study in any serious way. It will be interesting to find out how these various factors play into the taste of the tea. I have some ideas, but then, my ideas could very well be wrong.
Categories: Information · Objects
Tagged: musings, teaware, yixing
It’s not about the flavours
February 25, 2011 · 10 Comments
Not really, anyway.
I think flavours in tea are the sort of thing that initially attract us. The beany taste of Longjing, the high fragrance of a gaoshan oolong, or the camphor of a puerh are the sort of things that are immediate and satisfying. Teas often have flavours that you can’t find anywhere else, or they can come in combinations that are unexpected, surprising, or fascinating. A friend of mine tried one of my aged oolongs and commented that it tasted of ginseng-vanilla. Perhaps that’s a new flavour for ginseng that health food makers should consider.
Having said that, I think focusing too much on the flavour of a tea is almost missing the point. From observations and discussions with other tea drinkers, I think after a while, we all move, slowly, towards a deeper and more subtle appreciation of tea, and that means that we start moving away from just looking at what the tea taste like, and put more emphasis on what the tea feels like. Good (and usually expensive) teas invariably feel good in a way that inferior teas do not. They don’t always taste all that different, however.
The best example I can think of is teas from a store in Hong Kong that specializes in aged puerh of various kinds. They have their own storage unit, and the storage unit has a very distinctive and unmistakable smell that leaves a strong imprint on all their teas. I can probably pick out teas from this particular store from a lineup of different traditionally stored teas, just because I’ve had a number of them over the years. All of their teas, by and large, display a similar taste profile — a slightly ricey, musty taste that is short on camphor but long on medicine. It’s a distinctive profile, and it’s there in every one of their own teas. There are of course subtle variations, but they are not all that obvious. Yet, these teas don’t all sell for the same price — some are quite expensive, others are quite cheap.
The chief difference among them is the feeling you get from the tea. What I mean by that is not that it makes you high or your head spin or what not (although I suppose it could do that). Rather, it is the physical sensations that you have in reaction to, first, having the tea in your mouth, down your throat, and then the reaction that your body has towards it that distinguishes the better from the not so good. A nice one is full, thick, smooth, hits all corners of the mouth, leaves a strong, lasting aftertaste, stimulates the tongue and throat, and gives you a feeling of qi. Bad ones are just a beverage — you taste it, it goes down, it’s over.
Vendors, though, are quite unhelpful in this regard. This is especially true of mainstream vendors, who overwhelmingly talk about flavours, flavours, flavours. It’s all about the raisin note or the ripe fruit or the earthy flavours. It is almost never, ever about how the tea feels in your mouth — the most is some mention of astringency, perhaps, in some cases, of huigan, but that’s already getting into specialized territory. I think this is due, partly, to other beverage cultures, especially the wine community, where (for most people reading those tasting notes anyway) it’s all about the blackcurrants and what not. Tea, though, is not like that. It really shouldn’t be just about the flavours, but rather how it activates and excites the sensory nodes in your mouth — not just the tongue, but the entire mouth, perhaps even your body. I don’t know how we can change that, but I think we should at least try, in our own discussions, to incorporate these unique qualities of tea as much as we can.
Categories: Information
Tagged: musings
Silver revelation
February 8, 2011 · 3 Comments
Today I drank a sample that I got recently, without any real labels or anything. All I can remember (and discern) is that it’s some sort of an aged oolong — not really aged, just a few years under its belt, with a little sourness in the smell and that characteristic aged smell. I brewed it up normally, did not think much of it — seems a little hollow, and one note, but not particularly interesting. I brewed two kettle worth of water with it, and decided to basically call it a day.
Then, late night, I thought I wanted some more tea, but adhering to my one-tea-a-day rule, I had to just boil more water for my tea, instead of using new leaves. For some reason, I picked up my silver kettle instead of my usual tetsubin for the water. In the water goes, out comes the tea…. and the tea seems to have gained new life. All of a sudden, the taste is richer, with a fuller body and a deeper penetration into the back of the mouth and the throat area. The high note, which was already present in the original brewing, is now really obvious, but has undertones to support it so that the tea is not bland and hollow anymore. All in all, the tea is now good, and I want more.
This of course confirms what I already know, but sometimes forget – silver tends to be better for the teas with lighter notes. Sometimes, when faced with teas like aged oolongs, it’s not always easy to tell what’s going to happen, and experimentation is necessary. Now I wonder if I should go back and test some other recent teas with the silver kettle, which, until today, has been neglected in the back of my teaware cabinets. I think it’s time to work on water again.
Categories: Information · Teas
Tagged: silver, tetsubin, water
Principles of Chinese tea making
February 5, 2011 · 8 Comments
Every cup of tea has two ingredients – the tea leaves and the water. To fuse these two into a cup of tea, it goes through the process of brewing, and as every tea drinker who’s ever tried an overbrewed cup of tea knows, even the best leaves and water can make a terrible cup if the brewing method is flawed, whether by design or accident. In fact, among all the major beverages of the world, tea is perhaps the most demanding on the drinker in terms of what it asks for — to make a nice cup of tea, the drinker must be able to brew the tea, and hopefully, brew it well. It is not an accident that we call the Chinese style of tea making these days “gongfu cha”. Gongfu roughly translates into skill and ability, and the tea that results is really determined not by the ingredients that went into it, but by the hands of the person brewing it.
What exactly does this skill consist of? One way of thinking about it is to start with the end goal — a pleasant, presumably fragrant, and enjoyable cup of tea. This means that the cup should possess as few undesirable traits as possible, such as an overabundance of roughness, bitterness, or odd flavours, and also be flavourful, has depth, and a good body. An insipid cup does not have any bad traits, but the absence of any distinctive features at all is itself undesirable.
Now, the question is really how to get from leaves and water to an enjoyable cup of tea. If we leave out the issue of the leaves and water (you can read the rest of this blog for my thoughts on those issues) the only variables that we can actively influence as the tea brewer are the teaware, the leaves/water ratio, the temperature, and the time. Let’s talk about them in turn.
For most of us, teaware is often an automatic choice based on the type of tea in question and the number of people drinking. The most versatile, of course, is the gaiwan, and it is also perhaps the most neutral. For those of us who, by and large, use yixing or other kinds of teapots for brewing, there are a few things worth thinking about when assigning pots to teas. For example, is this an aged tea with a strong flavour, or a fragrant one with a delicate aroma? For the former, a more porous pot may be more useful, while the latter might suit a high density pot like a zhuni better. The shape of the pot may also come into play, as I generally find flatter pots with large openings more suitable for Wuyi yancha, while rounder shapes work better for rolled oolongs. How the pot pours is of paramount importance — not in terms of whether the flow stops if you stop the air hole (which I believe is of zero relevance) but rather how fast the water drains from the pot. If it takes too long, you should take that into consideration for the next question, which is the water/leaf ratio.
The question of how much leaves to use in a particular pot/gaiwan is really one of the biggest decision a tea brewer can make, and has implications for all kinds of issues like how fast to pour and what to expect from the cup. Examining the dry leaves and knowing what type/nature it is will help determine the amount of leaves to use. Lighter teas generally require less leaves, while heavier ones can take more, even though that may sound odd. When I say light, I mean lightly processed — greens, whites, qingxiang (little to no roast) oolongs, very young puerhs. When I say heavy, I have in mind nongxiang (heavily roasted) oolongs, aged teas of all kinds, heavily oxidized teas, etc. The amount of leaves, in grams, is really not a very useful unit to measure, because what really matters in terms of brewing is how much leaves there are versus how much water there will be in the vessel. 7g of tea is a lot in a 50ml gaiwan, but is not a lot in a 150ml pot. I always measure the amount of tea I use by how much of the vessel I’m filling up with the dry leaves. This can range from 1/8 to 3/4 of the vessel, depending on the tea and the nature of the leaves. Rolled leaves, for example, will expand greatly, so you need to leave room for it to do so, whereas flat leaves, such as certain Wuyis and dancongs, unfurl pretty much in place, and you sometimes need to pack more in to achieve certain tastes. There are also the special cases of brewing using Chaozhou style techniques (that’s another subject entirely) which needs different types of preparations.
The amount of leaves used determines, again, how fast the infusions should be, and also to a slightly lesser extent, the temperature of the water used. The teas I drink tend to be on the “heavy” side of the scale, so boiling water is generally required. When making lighter teas though, starting from qingxiang oolongs, it is often important to pay attention to how hot the water is and adjust accordingly. Lighter generally means cooler, as most of you already know. Cooler, however, also means longer steeps, and this is where it gets tricky, often involving active adjustments on the brewer’s part to get it right. Whereas using boiling hot water often means pouring the tea out quickly, often immediately, using cooler, longer steeps will result in different kinds of tastes. A heavy tea that is steeped quickly with hot water should be full bodied with the fragrance that is desired, but not the bitterness and roughness that will surely follow if steeped even slightly too long. With lighter teas, water that’s too hot will scald the leaves and can make the tea less fragrant or even bitter and nasty almost immediately, with no remedy possible once done. Cooler water with longer steeps will bring out the fragrant and sweet elements of the leaves without the tea suffering from damage.
It is, however, in the adjustment process where I think gongfu tea really gets its name. How to manage all these moving parts in a satisfactory way is the key to making a good cup of tea, Chinese style, and to be able to do that, it involves a certain amount of practice and experience, which then translates the act of brewing into an intuitive process that flows naturally, rather than something that resembles a science experiment, with measurements and timers and thermometers. Part of this is very much a practical problem — I’ve observed people who learned tea making a certain way who then follow the directions given to the letter (heck, I’ve done it myself early on — we all have) and it just doesn’t work. 5/10/15/30/30/60/60 is not how you make a good cup of puerh, or oolong, or anything. Being able to mix and match and adjust on the fly depending on what’s coming out from the pot is. If the last cup is too weak? Brew a little longer, or if the water hasn’t been reboiled in a few minutes (depending on the way you handle water in the brewing process) maybe it needs to be heated again. Or, if you’re not achieving a certain taste, perhaps you can push the tea a little further. Likewise, don’t be afraid to actually take leaves out of the pot — sometimes there’s just too much leaves in the pot, and as non-intuitive as this is, pull some leaves out. The resulting cup may actually be better.
Most importantly though, the adjustment process allows the tea to be brewed according to individual taste. I know that I like the tea certain people make more than others. They are just better tea brewers, at least in my eyes, regardless of what tea is given to them. There are those whose tea I had the misfortune of drinking, and by mangling it thoroughly, what should have been a great cup is destroyed. Sourness that should have been subdued became pronounced, Wuyi that should have that strong rock aftertaste turns into insipid brown tea, and young puerh brewed in such a way as to make me wonder if I should be drinking some white tea instead. When making tea for ourselves and ourselves alone, the adjustment process is easy — you have perfect feedback from yourself, and can tune the tea making a certain way. When making for a group of people, asking them how the tea is coming out is equally important. It is easy to fall into the routine of our own tea habits without thinking about the fact that now someone else has to drink that cup of tea. Maybe they don’t actually like (or can handle) 10g of Lao Banzhang in a 60ml pot. Maybe lightening up on the leaves will be a good idea. Drinking tea by yourself or with others is always a learning experience. The end goal, I think, is elusive, but every day we think about what we’re drinking, we’re getting closer to a better cup of tea.
Categories: Information
Tagged: musings, skills
Traditional, not wet
January 25, 2011 · 29 Comments
In the puerh storage world there has been a fierce debate in the past decade or so between those who believe in “dry storage” and those who don’t. Until the appearance of “dry stored” puerh, there has only been one way to handle this tea. The vendor (and it’s always the vendor — individual consumers didn’t buy raw puerh cakes, period) would take in his big order (we’re talking hundreds of cakes or more). Having evaluated the tea, which usually comes through a middleman who handles the actual transaction, he would decide what to do with it and how to handle it. Then, the tea goes into the “ground storage” 地倉unit, which is usually some basement in a building on a hill or something similar, so that it’s quite damp and dark. Usually, the storage unit already has lots of tea in there, aging, and the vendor would make room for the tea.
Now, this environment is usually high humidity and high heat — it gets hot in there for natural reasons (Hong Kong can get to 30C+ in the summer). Now, the tea isn’t just stored in there forever, and isn’t just going to stay in there for the duration of its life until it’s sold. The teas were put on little wooden platforms so they don’t touch the ground, and likewise they do not hug the walls — all to avoid excessive moisture accumulating. Also, the teas would get “rotated” every few months, which is actually a fairly big operation. What it does is to even out the aging process. So, a jian of tea that was sitting in the darkest, wettest corner of the storage unit won’t stay there forever, but instead moved out to the front where it’s drier and airier. The stuff that has been in the open before now gets the dark corner, etc. The same is true for how high the tea is placed (stuff on top gets moved down, vice versa). It is, I think, important to emphasize that they want to avoid excessive moisture.
This storage process differs by the tea and the vendor, but generally speaking, from the different vendors I’ve talked to, a tea normally would not stay in a ground storage facility for more than two years. Then the tea gets moved to a regular, dry storage facility, where the “removing the storage” 退倉 process begins. This would take much longer — six, eight, ten years, or whatever the vendor deems sufficient. It is only then when the tea is ready.
When I first started talking about wet storage on rec.food.drink.tea, I remember there were people who were quite skeptical of what good could possibly come of wet stored teas. In their experience, wet stored stuff was bad — unmitigated disaster, basically. Moldy, smelly, ruined, and dangerous — it was something to be avoided at all costs. For those who’ve never seen this stuff before, it can indeed look pretty frightening, especially the stuff that has a lot of white frost on them, like this:
It’s not that obvious here, but you can see white here and there on the leaves. If you don’t know what you’re looking at, you can easily take this to be bad, spoiled tea, only fit for the garbage. It looks bad, and it even looks bad when it’s in a cup — dark, almost pitch black sometimes, and generally looking somewhat murky, with that musty smell. If the “removing the storage” part hasn’t really been completed, or done poorly, it can still smell strongly of the ground storage unit, which can sometimes be a bit offensive to the untrained palette.
However, I am pretty sure this stuff is safe. After all, millions of people in Hong Kong drink this sort of thing every single day in restaurants everywhere. If it’s dangerous, its dangers are not apparent. Also, this method of storage means that each teahouse has its own flavour — after a while, if you keep going back to the same stores for different kinds of puerh, you’ll start to notice that each have their distinct “house” flavours, no doubt related to how they store and handle their teas. In this way, buying a puerh is as much buying a product of the original producer, as you are buying a “finished” (as opposed to raw) product from the tea vendor.
Now, dry storage — this is a term that really started showing up in, I believe, the 90s, and took on a whole new life after 2000. It is often attributed first to Vesper Chan of Best Tea House, although that distinction is questionable, but he’s probably the guy who’s the earliest and biggest beneficiary of this. What dry storage proponents believe is that traditionally stored puerh has a crucial flaw — that the process of putting the tea in ground storage fundamentally alters the way the tea tastes and smells, and some would also claim that it weakens the tea’s qi, and all the other stuff. On the other hand, something stored purely in a dry environment, meaning without ever going into that ground storage unit, would not have this problem. It retains the strength and the aroma of the original tea better. The downside is that it takes a lot longer to age. The tea also keeps its astringency a lot longer, as well as the bitterness.
It is also important to keep in mind here that dry storage doesn’t mean bone dry, “store it in a desert” storage. It means keeping it in an environment where there’s still a healthy amount of moisture (it’s Hong Kong, after all) and let it age naturally. Also, dry storage proponents, the ones who practice it on a large scale anyway, don’t generally store their teas in open air places — they are still storage units that are mostly closed off, shut off from sunlight, and stored carefully. Leaving it in a really airy corridor in the middle of an open air terrace in Arizona is not their idea of dry.
I think when it comes down to it, whether you like dry or traditional is really a matter of personal preference — there’s no easy answer to this. Those who use the “health” argument against traditionally stored teas are, I think, wrong, and increasingly, my friends in Northern China who used to hate that stuff are coming around to it. Dry stored teas have their place as well, I think, as it is really the theory that underpins home stored tea — before this, as I mentioned, nobody bought raw cakes. When YP, a really knowledgeable tea friend in Hong Kong, went with her friends in search of green, raw cakes in the 90s, the vendors basically stared at them like they’re from Mars, asking “you want WHAT? Why would you ever want that stuff?” It just wasn’t done until pretty recently. The fact that we all have tongs of teas in our own houses now is because we think we can do it ourselves.
One problem with traditionally stored tea is that it is often confused by consumers with fake tea — those teas that have been sprayed with water and (as one report had it a few years ago) literally left in the pig sty to age, or stuff made with discarded tea leaves not fit for human consumption, but made to look old. Traditionally stored puerh is most definitely not fake. It may not be your cup of tea, but it is very, very real, and it has been around longer than dry stored teas.
With that in mind, I would like to propose a shift in nomenclature — the use of the term “traditional storage” to substitute for the term “wet storage”. We can relegate “wet storage” back to where it used to be — where the fake teas belong. Traditional storage, on the other hand, is a venerable method of preparing tea for consumption in a very specific and technically skilled method. I think it deserves its place in the sun.
Categories: Information
Tagged: aged puerh, musings, storage, traditional stored puerh, young puerh
Absolute and relative quality
January 17, 2011 · 11 Comments
A question that I have discussed on a few separate occassions with friends over the last month or so has been the question of how to determine quality in a given agricultural product — in this case, tea, but more generally the usual suspects, such as wine, whisky, etc, came up as well over the course of discussion.
The problem is: how do we determine whether tea A is better than tea B? What are the standards, and who determines these standards? Is there such thing as a tea A that is unequivocally better than tea B?
Let’s start with the basic question. How do we determine what’s better and what’s worse? There are obviously different ways of approaching the question. The “scientific” one is one that bases itself on various metrics that are somehow measurable and readily testable. For example, something about dissolved materials in the water, amounts of various kinds of chemicals (name your favourite antioxidants, for example) and also the absence of unpleasant things. It’s a very scientific way of measuring tea, and coupled with more physical traits, such as the size of the leaves, the amount of variation in such traits, etc, you can arrive at a way to grade certain kinds of teas in a rough “best to worse” sort of way. Any buyer of Longjing would’ve encountered such a grading system — they are meticulously graded from high to low, with corresponding prices. The highest grade is the best, the lowest grade the worst. Simple, right?
Well, maybe, maybe not. I have met many people over the years who do not like the highest grade of Longjing — mingqian longjing can often be too soft and light, and for many, it is on the wrong side of being bland. For them, it is much better to drink something slightly lower grade — a yuqian, for example, or some other teji type Longjing. They find the flavour more robust, and the tea more interesting. The same can be said for people who prefer second flush Darjeelings over the first, etc.
That leads me to the question at hand — is that “objective” quality scale really a measure of quality, and is it absolute? In other words, can you really just say that a mingqian Longjing is better than 4th grade Longjing, period, no qualifications? Or can we only say that “for me, this mingqian Longjing is better than the 4th grade one”? Is there such thing as an absolute measure of quality?
When talking this over with a wine sommelier over the Christmas break, her argument is strongly in favour of the existence of some sort of absolute quality. One can indeed say that this Grand Cru Burgundy is better than that Beaujoulais, period (I know, not a fair fight, but I’m trying to make a point). Likewise, applying the same logic, one could say that this dahongpao is indeed better than that Taiwanese jinxuan oolong. The key to this measure, especially when one compares things that are not directly related to one another (as opposed to our Longjing example earlier where everything is supposed to be the same type) is the tongue of the expert, or perhaps a group of experts, who have tried a multitude of things and are very knowledgeable in their field of expertise. They can use their knowledge to evaluate the goods in question, and then arrive at some sort of measure of quality that puts different wines or teas or whatever into a ranking of one over another. In other words, there is such thing as absolute quality. I had a similar conversation with a friend’s friend, who, among other things, sells whisky. The logic was similar – the expert knows best, basically.
I must say I am not entirely convinced. What, exactly, does it mean when we say something is “better”? That it is of a higher quality, that it is more worthy of our money, or that it should be more pleasurable to partake in? Or, perhaps, none of the above, or some combination of all of the above?
That’s where I really have a problem with the idea that there is some absolute scale of quality. I know, from my own vantage point, that I have a personal scale of things that I think are higher quality than others. I know which teas I deem to be great, which ones good, which ones bad. I also know, however, that my ideas change, that what I think half a year ago as great may, upon further inspection, feel less great. There is, of course, also the question of interference — I am predisposed to think that a certain tea is better if I were told that it was some ultra rare tea that came from Zhou Yu, than some no-name stuff that one picked up from the Kunming tea market, and this is before I even take a sip of anything. In this case, one can make the case that the expert and his blind tasting, a la Robert Parker, is really the best way to judge a tea, but then, there is also the argument against blind tasting. The problem here really is a relativistic one — just because some expert out there, who presumably knows far more about tea/wine/whatever than the average joe, thinks A is better than B, does that make it really better? Does that actually MEAN anything?
I spent the past weekend with a tea friend who knows far more about black tea than I do. He drinks all manner of them, and also a number of darker oolongs and some puerh, mostly of the cooked variety. I’ve been trying to find this friend some quality raw puerh that he might like, but generally, I fail, because of a problem that never goes away — apparently, he is very sensitive to bitterness. I knew this all along, but it has been confirmed again, probably definitively, this time around. Because of this sensitivity, young, raw puerh in general tastes far too bitter for him to enjoy, and unless it is old or well stored in a traditional storage, the bitterness overpowers everything else a tea has to offer and is therefore unenjoyable. It doesn’t matter what I or anyone else thinks of these great young puerhs — even if it’s top flight, super high end stuff, he probably will still feel it’s too bitter and impossible to drink in an enjoyable way. Each of us, I think, have similar preferences and therefore will have our own personal scale. What, then, does it really mean when someone else who “knows” rates one over the other? So what?
We see this phenomenon with puerh all the time. Some critic out there, presumably someone who sits on a large stash of tea A, for example, goes on some magazine or internet forum and says that said tea A is excellent. Meanwhile, he is slowly feeding the tea to the market through various channels. Before you know it, the tea makes it big, gets famous, prices shoot up, all the while the tea itself is really…. not that great. But surely, these critics must know what they’re talking about, because they are, well, knowledgeable, right? They have twenty years of drinking experience, no? If you drink, say, tea A, and think it’s just ok, it must be because you don’t know how to appreciate it yet (and sometimes some of these critics will actually come and tell you that, in no uncertain terms — this happens more on Chinese forums than anywhere else) and that you just, well, need another ten years under your belt to really appreciate it.
Now, someone like Robert Parker doesn’t do that, I know, but even then, these wine critics do have their skin in the game, sort of. Even if a critic has no agenda, he or she is still biased by his or her own tongue in ways that we cannot know. Wine drinkers lament the direction in which the market is headed, just like how tea drinkers in Hong Kong lament the demise of traditionally processed tieguanyin, but nonetheless, the market moves that way, often guided by a number of influential individuals who prefer their drinks a certain way. In
the case of tea, the process is infinitely more complicated because the drinker is also, indirectly, the maker — you brew your own tea. The critic/expert is not there to make it for you, so although the expert, in his expertly way, might make the tea a certain way and come to a certain conclusion, for the drinker reading said criticisms, that might not be relevant at all. If the drinker is, say, an expert in making tea grandpa style, but the critic is drinking his with 10g of tea in an 80ml zhuni pot…. do the critic’s comments still apply? Really?
This is partly why I basically no longer post tea reviews of any sort, save for ones I find particularly interesting or when I really feel like having something to say. With tea I just find that the room for variation is very large — it basically all depends on how you make the tea, and to a very large extent, the water you use. What I find to be excellent is not always going to go down well with other people, and while I am convinced that I have some basis in what I say, it does not mean that what I say applies to anyone else, really. One person’s “butchering” of a tea in terms of brewing methods can be another one’s “perfect”. What’s more important than figuring out the supposed absolute quality of a tea is to figure out how to get the most out of the tea. That, I think, is the key to tea drinking.
Categories: Information · Old Xanga posts
Tagged: musings
An upgrade in taste
January 8, 2011 · 4 Comments
As I returned to the US and brewed up my first pot of tea here… I find myself deeply dissatisfied with what I’m drinking. When I left, I would be quite happy drinking this. No more. Now this tea, some aged, broken cake, seems thin and weak. It’s got decent flavours, but the body is not there, nor does it have the depth that I need. The $100 cake I bought a few days ago that is traditionally stored since 2001 seems leaps and bounds better.
Uh oh, I think my tongue just got upgraded.
Categories: Information · Old Xanga posts
Tagged: friends, musings
Dear MarshalN, looking back, I've been reading your blog for 14 years now, and thank you for many helpful and…